latdiamond.blogg.se

1. #Mac pro 2007 8 core benchmark for mac#
2. #Mac pro 2007 8 core benchmark movie#
3. #Mac pro 2007 8 core benchmark software#
4. #Mac pro 2007 8 core benchmark professional#

With the additional memory, the eight-core model ended up winning each of our professional application tests. To see how additional RAM might affect performance, we configured each system with 4GB of RAM and ran the professional application tests again. When we did this, the eight-core machine managed to squeeze out speed improvements of between 9 to 15 percent over the quad-core model. (You can also use Qmaster to put idle computers on your network to work on tasks, but for our tests we used only our internal processors.) Our DVD encoding test worked best when splitting the processors up into four instances. In the Qmaster control panel, you can set a cluster to handle a specific number of cores by configuring Instances. Many of the compression codecs are not optimized for multiprocessing, so to get the best performance, you need to use Apple’s Qmaster, a utility included with Final Cut Studio that allows you to set up and share a cluster comprised of your system’s internal processor cores.

Running Compressor 3 with multiple cores gets complicated.

#Mac pro 2007 8 core benchmark movie#

The other test that showed measurable improvement, however modest, was encoding a movie using Compressor 3. In this test, the eight-core 3GHz system was 44 percent faster than the quad-core 3GHz model, finishing the job in just 14 seconds the quad took 25 seconds. The rendering window splits itself into eight horizontal chunks, and you can watch each area being drawn simultaneously.

Running this test, it’s easy to see how well this program takes advantage of all of the processors in a system. One test that did see great improvement with eight processing cores was our 3-D rendering test using Cinema 4D.

#Mac pro 2007 8 core benchmark software#

Some of Speedmark’s application tests see no benefit from multiple processors, and some, like our Microsoft Office tests, still rely on Apple’s Rosetta translation software to run on the Mac Pro’s Intel processors. We use Speedmark to test everything from Mac minis to Mac Pros. In fact, the eight-core processor was just 4 percent faster than the quad-core 3GHz Mac Pro in our Speedmark overall system benchmark. In the bulk of our testing, in which tasks were performed one at a time, doubling the processors didn’t make much of a difference. The problem with this multicore strategy is that throwing more processors at a job doesn’t always mean that the task will finish faster.īy using the same configuration on both machines, it is easy to see where and how the different processors impact performance. The new eight-core Mac Pro uses two 3GHz quad-core Intel Xeon processors. In fact, every Mac in Apple’s current product line is using at least dual-core Intel processors-the rest of the Mac Pro processor options feature two dual-core processors running at 2GHz, 2.66GHz, or 3GHz. While it’s true that processor speeds continue to make modest gains, these days most manufacturers are touting multiple processors on their chips, a change from the past, when processor vendors enjoyed frequent, remarkable leaps in individual processor speeds. Our testing, however, shows that most people would be served just as well by a less-expensive

#Mac pro 2007 8 core benchmark for mac#

For software programmers eager to help their applications take advantage of multicore systems, or for Mac users who regularly spend hours compressing video or rendering 3-D scenes, purchasing the eight-core Mac Pro makes sense. Apple’s professional tower, the highly configurable Mac Pro, recently added another choice that features eight processing cores, all running at 3GHz. Many hotshots look straight to the top of the line when shopping for a new Mac. Power-hungry computer pros are always looking for tools to speed up time-consuming tasks.